Interfaith Journeys
  • Home
  • Interfaith Journeys
  • Stella Reekie

Celebrating Nostra Aetate

2/11/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
October 28th this year was the 60th anniversary of the promulgation of the document Nostra Aetate. It was one of the last documents to be publicly and formally ratified at the Second Vatican Council but one which has significantly changed the Catholic Church’s relationship with people of faith. Like all Vatican Documents it is called by the first two words of the latin translation – Nostra Aetate – In Our Time and the first words of this short document set the scene  “In our time when day by day mankind (sic)is being drawn closer together and the ties between different people are becoming stronger the Church examines more closely her relations to non – Christian religions.” This was a historic moment for a Church which because it had believed and preached no salvation outside the Church saw other faiths as being in error and worthy only of conversion.   

At the heart of the document and its most developed section is the one on Judaism, though other sections do reflect on Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism.  The Church’s history of relations with the Jews had been an unhappy one to say the least. Forced sermons, legal restrictions, forced expulsions, accusations of being God – killers had led to the Jewish community living in isolation and being subject to violence and abuse at the hands of Christians.  The Jews were regarded as perfidious – God had rejected them because they had rejected the Messiah and the Church was now the new People of God, the true inheritors of the Covenant.

This traditional teaching was turned on its head as the Church acknowledged that Jews and Christians share a religious bond and spiritual legacy. The Church decried hatred, persecutions, displays of antisemitism directed against Jews at any time and by anyone. Any sense of Jews being under a curse was rejected as was the accusation that they were responsible for the death of Jesus.  There was no talk of the need to convert the Jews. Rather the document said that “the church awaits that day, known to God alone on which all people will address the Lord in a single voice and “serve him shoulder to shoulder”.  There was no sense that God had repudiated the covenant with the Jews. They are still His chosen people for “God does not repent of the gifts He makes or of the calls He issues”

These were strong statements in the light of past history but some Jews were disappointed that there was no expression of sorrow or apology for past anti- Semitism.  While some might have been disappointed others realised its significance in overturning centuries of anti-Jewish attitudes. Rabbi David Rosen, the American Jewish Committee's head of Inter-religious Relations and Adviser to the Rabbinate of Israel, speaking some years ago in Scotland, said that he did not know of any other document or action that had so transformed human relations as Nostra Aetate.  For him Nostra Aetate “a monumental turnaround” unparalleled in history was a sign of hope that any relationship whether religious or political could be changed. Rabbi Rosen said: “There is no parallel in human history for the transformation that has taken place. From being a community seen as cursed by God, deserving of suffering and condemned to wander the world homeless, to a relationship of respect as the ‘elder brother’ of the covenant – never broken or to be broken – is a blessed transformation in our times.”

And so began the journey of interreligious dialogue where together faiths could share their wisdom and truth, a journey witnessed to by all the Popes since John XXIII and one which is now seen as intrinsic to the catholic faith. It is this journey that has been celebrated this past week in conferences and dialogues throughout the world. At the Vatican Conference, Walking Together in Hope, Pope Leo called Nostra Aetate a luminous document which “teaches us to meet the followers of other religions not as outsiders, but as travelling companions on the path of truth”. Addressing representatives of world religions, members of the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See, and Vatican and Church officials committed to interreligious dialogue, who had gathered in the Paul VI Hall to celebrate the anniversary of this historic Declaration the Pope continued “Today, your presence bears witness that this seed has grown into a mighty tree, its branches reaching far and wide, offering shelter and bearing the rich fruits of understanding, friendship, cooperation and peace.”
It would be very difficult for people of faith today to deny the need for interreligious dialogue and in all faiths there are those who in their commitment to it are a beacon of hope and in their dialogues show that a way of fellowship and harmony is possible across diversity and difference. Dialogue has its joys and its blessings but also its misunderstandings, difficulties and conflicts especially when associated with geo-political tensions but said the Pope “we must not allow political circumstances and the injustices of some to divert us from friendship, especially since we have achieved so much so far……Nostra Aetate reminds us that true dialogue is rooted in love, the only foundation of peace, justice and reconciliation, whereas it firmly rejects every form of discrimination or persecution, affirming the equal dignity of every human being.  More than ever, our world needs our unity, our friendship and our collaboration. Each one of our religions can contribute to alleviating human suffering and taking care of our common home, our planet Earth. Our respective traditions teach truth, compassion, reconciliation, justice and peace. We must reaffirm service to humanity, at all times.”

​Wonderfully strong, inspiring and encouraging words for those of us engaged in dialogue. We have come a long way but we have still further to travel. This week is Interfaith Week in Scotland and there will be many interfaith events which offer the opportunity to all to enter into the world of dialogue. Hopefully more and more people will do so  knowing that in doing so they are sowing seeds of hope, peace and reconciliation in our land and in our world.

0 Comments

Nurturing Peace

17/10/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Each year the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue sends greetings to faith communities throughout the world and the latest has been sent to the Hindu community as they prepare to celebrate the festival of Diwali (Deepavali) on 20 October. As with all the letters from the Dicastery there is a theme and this year it is 'Hindus and Christians: Building world peace through dialogue and collaboration in the spirit of Nostra Aetate'. It invites Christians and Hindus, "as believers rooted in our respective faith traditions, and as people united by shared values and a common concern for peace, may we... together with those of other religions and all people of goodwill - join hands in both small and great ways to nurture peace in our homes, communities and societies."

Reflecting on the fact that the 28th October is the 60th anniversary of Nostra Aetate, Cardinal Koovakad, Prefect to the Dicastery, writes “During this festive season, we invite you to join us in reflecting on how Christians and Hindus, together with people of all faiths and goodwill, can strengthen our shared efforts for peace through dialogue and collaboration in the spirit of Nostra Aetate." This he said is rooted in "promoting unity and love among people, indeed among nations" by focusing on "what people have in common and what draws them to fellowship …In today's world, where mistrust, polarization, tensions and divisions are on the rise, interreligious dialogue is more necessary than ever. It must continue to sow seeds of unity and harmony, becoming a beacon of hope for all."

These are noble sentiments and my own conviction is that interreligious friendship and dialogue can be a witness to the possibility that we can live with and even understand difference in a world that doesn’t like difference. But it’s not easy and much of our interfaith dialogue is preparing the way for deeper and more honest dialogue that looks not just at what we have in common but rather at the issues that are in danger of continuing the polarisation and division. There is a danger that we never get to that point, afraid to face the elephant in the room so that interreligious dialogue is like a toothless tiger that does not bring about change or transformation. I have been to so many dialogues where we have talked about food, festivals, rites of passage, even beliefs that are interesting and important especially for people for whom this is their first experience of meeting someone from another faith. But how do we dialogue and what do we dialogue about so that the participants have the experience of standing in the shoes of another and seeing life from that perspective? Sometimes this does show commonalities for we are indeed united in our humanity, and all faiths are dealing with the same fundamental questions of life and death and we can extend our own understanding of these questions by encountering the wisdom of other traditions.  Sometimes people are not too interested in standing in the shoes of another but participate in the dialogue to tell their own story rather than listen to that of the other. This can be particularly true if the dialogue partner feels their faith is in the minority and misunderstood by society or seems to suffer from discrimination more than others.

Recently I was sent a statement by Helen Mirren which states that there is no point in arguing with anyone not mature enough to grasp the concept of a different perspective .. there’s a difference between a healthy discussion and a pointless debate.  It was sent in the context of the conflict in Gaza, suggesting that there is no point in talking to the ‘other’side but I wonder if there is a point in listening to the other side, which is what dialogue is fundamentally about. It’s not about changing one’s own beliefs but it is about trying to understand the other side – and them understanding you. This of course requires an openness to others, a belief that our own perspective might be limited and in some circumstances a great deal of courage.

One of the most meaningful dialogues I have participated in was one set up by Interfaith Glasgow and the West of Scotland branch of the Council of Christians and Jews. Some Christians and Jews were invited to engage in a dialogue which looked at antisemitism as it related to the situation in Israel and Palestine. This was before the present war but even then nothing seemed to polarise people as much as the conflict in the Middle East. There were tense moments in the dialogue but the honesty between the participants allowed for a growth in understanding and a recognition of the different perspectives we can have of the same situation. The results of this dialogue was the publication of a report ‘Creating Brave Spaces’ which described the processes and tools used in the dialogue as well as reflections from the participants and the facilitators. We learned that these dialogues need careful planning and facilitation using a variety of tools to foster active listening. Participants must feel safe. That is why they cannot be entered into easily and why some of the ‘softer’ dialogues are necessary and good preparation for the more difficult conversations.

One of the first lessons learned in these difficult spaces is how language can mean different things in different contexts and lead to misunderstandings. As I said in my last blog the cry “from the river to the sea…. “heard during peace marches and demonstrations is heard and interpreted quite differently by the Jewish community than it will be by many demonstrating who know nothing of it as a Hamas slogan and think they are only calling for peace. So interfaith dialogue and its desire for a deep peace is not easy. At the moment in the context for me of Christian – Jewish relations it demands courage to meet the moment and not escape into a superficial peace, to recognise the pain of all involved and feel that pain, to feel uncomfortable but honest and often misunderstood, to truly listen to where people are coming from and feel compassion. It’s all I can do, hoping and praying that it sows a seed for peace in my corner of the world that might just have a ripple effect elsewhere  

0 Comments

Interreligious Peacemaking

17/9/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
The situation in the Gaza seems to go from bad to worse. The scenes on our televised news programmes night after night are distressing. This cannot be called a war in the conventional sense as it seems so one sided. Ordinary men and women from both Palestine and Israel are being let down by governments that refuse to listen to their calls for peace. Recently at a demonstration in Palestine against the Hamas government cries of “All of Hamas, out!” were heard. One participant said “The world thinks that Gaza is Hamas and Hamas is Gaza.  "We didn't choose Hamas and now Hamas is determined to rule Gaza and tie our fate to its own. Hamas must retreat." Al- Natour, a columnist in the Washington Post earlier this year wrote "To support Hamas is to be for Palestinian death, not Palestinian freedom".  To engage in such opposition is both courageous and dangerous and Amnesty International has documented what it calls “a disturbing pattern of threats, intimidation and harassment, including interrogations and beatings by Hamas against peaceful protesters”.

So too there have been increasing demonstrations calling for peace and the return of the hostages in Israel, which are obviously being ignored by their government.  Recently an international coalition of over 80 orthodox rabbis urged Israel to confront the widespread starvation in Gaza and condemn extremist settler violence. In a statement entitled “A Call for Moral Clarity, Responsibility, and a Jewish Orthodox Response in the Face of the Gaza Humanitarian Crisis” the signatories emphasize their deep bond with Israel and acknowledge the atrocities committed by Hamas but insist that this does not absolve Israel of responsibility for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. “The heart of Torah is justice, not revenge” it states. “This moment demands a different voice—one grounded in our deepest Jewish values and informed by our traumatic history of persecution. We must affirm that Judaism’s vision of justice and compassion extends to all human beings…..  Let us be resounding voices for justice, righteousness, and peace for all people—even and especially in the hardest of times.”

But how do we as Christians respond to the dreadful situation in the land that gave birth to Jesus?  Christianity is a faith that upholds justice, and many of us have a particular concern for the poor and oppressed. We call out injustice when we see it.  Regarding the situation in the Middle East this means showing support for Palestine and being overt in criticising the State of Israel and taking it for granted that others share this opinion. To even suggest there might be another way of looking at things is to provoke an angry response and dismissal as someone who supports injustice and stands with the oppressor.  In my experience there is usually no willingness to engage in a conversation about it as it is so obvious that there  will be no peace in Israel/Gaza without justice and we must call out the injustice because it is obvious where right lies. And so, we have statement after statement calling for peace, demonstration after demonstration in support of Palestine, event after event telling of the sufferings of the Palestinian people.

This, however, is not the way of interreligious dialogue. While it is true that there will be no peace without justice, so too there will be no justice without peace.  What would it mean to make peacebuilding rather than justice the focus of our concern? Hans Kung gave us the formula for this many years ago “there will be no peace in the world without peace between the religions; there will be no peace between the religions without dialogue among the religions”. The way of peace is the way of dialogue. For those of us involved in interfaith an important element in our work is not to allow international conflicts to destroy good relations at home. The reality of the Israel/Palestine conflict has done just that and led to an increase in antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment so that some members of the Jewish community are afraid to admit openly that they are Jewish and feel unsafe in Scotland for the first time in their lives.  A recent public gathering to remember and pray for the hostages taken by Hamas on October 7th 2023 had pro- Palestinian supporters calling the participants rats, lizards, reptiles and baby-killers, the kind of language that encourages hatred and is often a forerunner of violence.  

The Jewish community in Scotland is not responsible for the decisions and actions of the Israeli government, just as the catholic community in Scotland was not responsible for the actions of the IRA in the past. Many of them will not agree with the government and I have not met anyone who would support Netanyahu. However, they do have a love of Israel and a belief in the State of Israel’s right to self -determination. For them Israel is the only place in the world where they feel truly safe. The chant heard on peace marches and at peace events “from the river to the sea Palestine will be free” comes from Hamas who style themselves as an Islamic Resistance Movement and have declared in their Covenant of 1988 that they want the obliteration of the Jewish State, the establishment of an Islamic one and that they reject all peace negotiations. They contend that the Jews were behind “the French Revolution, the Communist revolution and most of the revolutions we heard and hear about, here and there. With their money they formed secret societies, such as Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, the Lions and others in different parts of the world for the purpose of sabotaging societies and achieving Zionist interests....  They were behind World War I, when they were able to destroy the Islamic Caliphate, making financial gains and controlling resources. They obtained the Balfour Declaration, formed the League of Nations through which they could rule the world. They were behind World War II, through which they made huge financial gains by trading in armaments, and paved the way for the establishment of their state. It was they who instigated the replacement of the League of Nations with the United Nations and the Security Council to enable them to rule the world through them. There is no war going on anywhere, without having their finger in it. Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Moslem people. "May the cowards never sleep."

These kind of stories are not unknown in the West and over the centuries such scurrilous tales including blood libels that believed Jews used the blood of Christian children in the leaven bread of Passover led through the centuries to pogroms, forced conversions and expulsions. It was the centuries of Christian antisemitism that led to the growth of a Zionist movement that worked for the establishment of a Jewish State. So the cry “from the river to the sea…. “ heard during peace marches and demonstrations is heard and interpreted  quite differently by the Jewish community than it will be by many demonstrating who know nothing of its origins and think they are only calling for peace. 

I often hear the Balfour Declaration blamed for the situation in Palestine and it is true that to expect two nations to inhabit the same piece of land without any help on how this should be done was short-sighted if not down right wrong but the Balfour Declaration did not come from no-where and the situation might have been quite different if there had not been the dreadful history of Christian antisemitism. 

This year we celebrate the 60th anniversary of Nostra Aetate which came into being after a Jewish historian, Jules Isaac, had met Pope John XXIII and pointed out the ways in which the Christian scriptures and scripture teaching had been interpreted in anti- Jewish ways.  The document began a new relationship with the Jewish community. It rejected traditional anti- Jewish tropes and accepted our need for a new dialogue and understanding of Judaism.  I hope that the situation in Gaza does not overshadow the work that still needs to be done in listening to our brothers and sisters in faith. 

Let us then celebrate this anniversary by engaging in some kind of Christian – Jewish dialogue, learning to stand in another’s shoes, understanding how things might look from another perspective and in  so doing know that we are indeed engaging in practical peace-making and making the world that bit a safer place for us all to live.


0 Comments

An Unusual Dialogue

4/9/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
I had a very interesting interfaith encounter this weekend. It was a visit to new Hindu Mandir in East Renfrewshire. What was so interesting about this visit was that the temple is located in a former orthodox synagogue which has recently closed and merged with another synagogue fairly close by. The Hindu community had been looking for a place of worship and were delighted to be able to lease the synagogue as a place already sacred and dedicated to prayer. The visit was organised by the West of Scotland Council of Christians and Jews and as well as members of the branch of CCJ a number of Jews who were members of the Reform Synagogue (now known as the Progressive Synagogue with the merger of Reform and Liberal Judaism) that is just behind the Mandir, curious to see how the synagogue had been adapted to the Hindu community’s needs.

Judaism and Hinduism are very different religions. Sometimes students of religious studies group religions by similar characteristics. One way of doing this – at least for Christians – is to think of them as displaying protestant and catholic traits. Protestant faiths would be Judaism, Islam and certain schools of Buddhism such as Zen. These religions have simple prayer rituals, are devoid of images and focus very much on the word. Catholic faiths on the other hand are usually more colourful, with images, smells and bells and a more stylised liturgy. Hinduism would come in to this category as would Tibetan Buddhism. As an orthodox synagogue the building in Newton Mearns would have had no images or colourful decoration, the Ark which housed the Torah Scrolls would have taken centre stage, the congregation would have been seated in pews and religious dress would have been a prayer shawl and kippah worn by men but not by women. As a Hindu Temple, the Ark and the Bimah or platform from which the Scriptures would have been read had been removed which gave an empty space in the middle of the temple and the focus was a highly decorated shrine with several statues of Hindu deities. I wondered how Jewish friends would feel about this change and thought some might feel uncomfortable. But no, the Jews who visited last Sunday were delighted to be there and very happy to make contact with the community. Perhaps this was because they came from the Reform Synagogue though some of them had attended services in that synagogue.

We entered the building through the main entrance which had Hebrew writing over it telling us “ Happy are those who dwell in Your house; they forever praise You”. We  were very warmly welcomed by the President of the Mandir before taking off our shoes in the cloakroom and mounting the stairs to the temple itself. There were several people around and obvious preparations for events happening that afternoon, but the prayer space itself was empty as the formal worship, called puja, had not yet started. The pews from the synagogue surrounded the space where the community would be sitting on the floor, many of them carrying the names of members of the Jewish community whom I suppose had paid for that seat. It was not hard to imagine the spirit of those people and the energy of their prayers still being around and somehow adding to the energy and good will of the Hindu puja. Fanciful? Perhaps. I do believe that places of worship that have been prayed in for years and in some cases centuries do have an energy that comes from the faith of the worshippers and that all things are connected and interrelated in a way that reaches to the past as well as the present and future. It was not hard for me to imagine those members of the Jewish community embracing their Hindu brothers and sisters as they prayed.

 There was time for dialogue and learning more about the community. We learned that the Hindu approach to God is two-fold – manifest and unmanifest. The manifest takes the form of pictures and statues as a focus for the mind but leads to an experience and sense of God as unmanifest, a Mystery acknowledged by all religions including Judaism and Christianity. The Mandir is called Mother Earth Temple which is so appropriate for the times we live in and reflects the Hindu connection to the earth which is regarded as a Sacred Goddess who is the mother of every form of life that has ever taken birth from her and has lived upon her. Whatever one’s background, and whatever name one knows God by, Mother Earth unites us. The community wants the temple to be a space for people of all faiths and none to pause, meditate and reflect, to re-establish unity while sharing and celebrating diversity. 

Despite the strangeness and the differences between Hinduism and Judaism everyone felt very at home and began to see connections. Both religions follow a lunar calendar which means they are often celebrating festivals at the same time; both religions have a plethora of festivals and often these festivals last for days at a time; there is a perambulation round the shrine in Hinduism and round the Synagogue at the feast of Sukkot and Simcha Torah.  

​This year Sukkot takes place early in October. It celebrates a successful harvest and is a reminder of the time the Israelites spent in the desert after the Exodus. It is celebrated by building a sukkah - a temporary hut which has a roof made of plants, fruits or leaves, and families eat meals and spend time in it during the festival. There will be one outside the Reform Synagogue, so the rabbi promised an invitation to the Hindu community. They were delighted. This hopefully will be the beginning of a friendship and dialogue which I suspect will be unique in the world of interreligious dialogue. I look forward to seeing how it flourishes.

0 Comments

Ever Widening Circles

16/8/2025

1 Comment

 
Picture
There is a story in the Hindu scripture in which the Lord Krishna is depicted as a flute player who entices the young women of the village with his music. Attracted by his flute they leave their homes, their families, their husbands to dance the night away with Krishna who multiplies himself so that each one feels herself totally loved.  Hearing his call, they have no option but to follow even if to do so is to break convention and tradition. Mary Oliver’s poem the journey expresses the same sentiments when she says that one day you know what you have to do as you “strode deeper and deeper into the world.”  
 
Recently I’ve been part of a small workshop in which the participants were to reflect on their life and answer the question Who am I?  I became aware that like the young women attracted to Krishna or the attraction to life in Mary Oliver’s poem my life has been a journey to move in ever wider circles, attracted by future possibilities.  Another way of expressing this is to see it as a call, a call that I believe is at the heart of a life in which all of humanity participates and which comes to each of us from the beginning of time. We all have our own journey but this is mine:
 
 I have been called forth since the beginning of time when 13.7 billion years ago, with a great flaring forth of light, the universe was born,

I have been called forth through the formation of a planet of burning molten rock and its transformation into birds and bees and butterflies and into the emergence of human thought and music and love,

I have been called forth through the emergence of homo sapiens and all the ages and stages of the human journey to be given form at this moment in history, enriched by the gifts and wisdom of the past but constrained by its present limitations.

I was called forth into this present existence when I was born in my grandparents’ home in Glasgow towards the end of the war and given faith and nourishment in a loving and committed catholic family, particularly through my grandmother to whom I feel particularly close.  I treasure and am grateful for an abiding memory that I have of sitting by her side while she read stories of the lives of the saints from small highly illustrated books.  These captured my imagination, and I am sure sowed the seeds of my religious vocation.

The call into life and faith was deepened through a loving and committed family and church life as well as a catholic education which nurtured and deepened my belief in God and my attraction to religion and spirituality. Training to be a teacher at Notre Dame college consolidated this attraction so that I entered the novitiate of the Sisters of Notre Dame, which was a difficult experience as in the silence I had to face up to my inner demons and struggles.

The call to service came through my experience of ministry in teaching and lecturing before going to study at Lancaster University.

 Lancaster turned out to be the catalyst for a profound call, which was not immediately recognised, but changed my life, my faith and my understanding of religion. I came to see it as the most graced moment of my life. It was a watershed so that I could think of my life’s journey as pre-Lancaster and post-Lancaster.  

 Through the experience of studying world faiths and the responsibility for teaching world religions at Notre Dame college and my involvement in the Glasgow Sharing of Faiths I was able to pass over into the world of other  faiths through reading and reflecting on their scriptures, studying and teaching their beliefs, visiting their places of worship as well as parts of the world such as Israel, India, Pakistan, Japan and China where faiths other than Christianity were dominant.  But more importantly I came to know and appreciate friends within those faiths who were living good and upright lives and were obviously in a loving and real relationship with that Reality we call God.

I then came back to my own to know myself and my understanding of my Catholic Christianity as changed. I struggled with traditional expressions of faith as found in the creeds and liturgy as I prepared and taught theology, grateful for the openness and inclusiveness of the theology coming from the Second Vatican Council, a theology not always acknowledged in church. The call now was to reach beyond the confines of one faith to embrace others and to work in the field of interreligious dialogue and religious education in an ecumenical context which was a source of many graces so that interreligious dialogue has become the very air I breathe.

 The initial call that came to me at my grandmother’s knee has continued throughout my life. I still feel the attraction to spirituality, theology, interfaith relations and am grateful for the opportunities I have to continue this interest and hopefully to grow in wisdom and faith. I am particularly grateful for the modern developments in theology that take seriously the story of the universe and the work of ecology which, along with Buddhism has helped transform my understanding of God, self and life.  Now I have come to understand the gospel message and my Catholic faith in new ways so that I see the core of the Gospel message as being about the fullness of life. 
​   
The call will continue, and the time is coming when it will lead to death and whatever follows after. This gift of life has been an adventure and like all adventures it has had its moments of light and darkness, joys and sorrows. It has been a journey of exploration. It has led me to face up to my inner self through study, prayer, retreats and spiritual direction. It has also led me to explore and teach theology, justice issues and world religions. The opportunity to study, read about, dialogue with other faiths and encounter many wonderful people has been a transforming one, both for my understanding of myself and my faith.  I am very grateful for all that my life in Notre Dame has given me and for the community that has made this possible.  I hope that I have contributed in some way to what Christians would call the Kingdom of God and that whatever the future holds I can continue to contribute in whatever small way I can to the well-being of all sentient beings and so take the human family a little further on its journey towards love. It’s a great adventure and one we are all engaged in if we but knew it. 

1 Comment

Joanna Macy, A Prophet for our Time

26/7/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture

On 19th July a remarkable woman died.  Her name was Joanna Macy and she was 96 years old.  There have been many tributes to her and her work.   The one from the Yale Forum on Religion and Ecology described her as “an extraordinary teacher, writer, and activist whose work will influence many people and projects for years to come. She was a luminous being with an extraordinarily generous spirit. Her Buddhist-inspired wisdom and compassion gave her the energy to work in the areas of ecology, justice, and peace throughout her life”. I have a sense of sadness at her death and feel that the world is the poorer for her passing, but her influence will carry on.  I didn’t know her personally, but she was influential in my life through her writing, workshops and lectures, many of which can be found on YouTube.

I first came to know her work when I bought a book of hers thirty years ago on Iona. It was called ‘World as Lover, World as Self’. It focussed on our interrelatedness and interdependency with nature, something which we must embrace if we are to have a sustainable future for humanity and our world. What I remember most about the book is a meditation which I have often used with groups. It guides us to connect with our parents, grandparents, our ancestors, travelling in our imagination through all the stages of history to that point when homo sapiens sets forth in its journey into the world. Then we imagine the call to life coming in reverse from that first moment of the human journey through all the stages of history, through the generations of our grandparents and parents to be given life and form at this point in history. For me this was mind blowing and changed my whole sense of self. I am not an individual who is separate from all those who in my past have passed on the gift of life, generation after generation. They live in me.  My life force, DNA goes back to the moment when it first began. I am mistaken if I think I live a life separate from them. As Thich Nhat Hanh has said “I have arrived, I am home in the here and the now”. 

My next encounter with Joanna was many years later through her book, ‘Active Hope’ written in partnership with Chris Johnstone. It was the subtitle that attracted me - ‘How to Face the Mess We Are in Without Going Crazy’ though this was changed in later editions of the book to ‘How to Face the Mess We Are in With Unexpected Resilience and Creative Power’.  This book sets out Joanna’s philosophy and draws on her work of leading empowering workshops and setting up the Work that Reconnects Network. For Joanna there are three possible stories, true of society at the moment, that we can choose to live by -  Business as Usual which suggests there is very little that needs to change in the way we live; the Great Unravelling which draws attention to and indeed contributes to the disasters and crises caused by a Business as Usual approach such as economic, social and environmental collapse; the Great Turning which is for those who don’t want the Great Unraveling to have the last word and so seek new ways of relating and acting to move from an Industrial Growth Society to a Life Sustaining one. The last is the one to which Joanna Macy dedicated her life and the focus of the Work that Reconnects. The process and sequence of the experiential side of the work is a spiral in which one begins with gratitude, moves through honouring our pain for the world, seeing with new eyes and then going forth to contribute to the transformation of our planet in whatever way is ours to do.  
​
I have been fortunate enough to have read and worked through the exercises in Active Hope with a group in my community, to have taken part in a retreat which worked through the spiral, using Joanna’s exercises and to have been at the launch of the Scottish Network of ‘The Work that Reconnects’ as well as several of their training days. So, I feel that the spiral and the approach of the Work that Reconnects has became a part of my life and I am grateful for it.  This year the Work that Reconnects is celebrating its 10th anniversary which means it was set up when Joanna was 86 years old, no doubt not single handedly, but still a challenging thought for someone of my age. Joanna was a great storyteller and one story she loved to tell and one which I have used is about the Shambhala Warrior.

 It actually comes from the Tibetan tradition and was written in the 12th cy.  It goes like this.
“There comes a time when all life on Earth is in danger…. It is now, when the future of all beings hangs by the frailest of threads, that the kingdom of Shambhala emerges.
"You cannot go there, for it is not a place. It exists in the hearts and minds of the Shambhala warriors. But you cannot recognize a Shambhala warrior by sight, for there is no uniform or insignia, there are no banners……. great courage is required of the Shambhala warriors, moral and physical courage. And for this they must go into training  -   and how do they train?
"They train in the use of two weapons, the weapons of insight and compassion, insight to recognise everyone as their brothers and sisters, compassion to feel the pain of the world and respond with love.”
​
I am one of the many who will mourn Joanna Macy but above all I will be grateful for the legacy she has left and the knowledge that all who are seeking to participate in the Great Turning, and there are myriad ways of doing this,  are part of a great movement for the transformation of our world and the establishment of the Kingdom of Shambhala which for Christians is the Kingdom of God.  



0 Comments

Religion in the Home

14/7/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
 ​I took part in a dialogue recently that focussed on religion in the home.  It was organised by Interfaith Glasgow and St Mungo’s Museum of Religious Life and Art, and the purpose was to explore the issue in the hope that it might become a new theme for the redevelopment of one of the gallery spaces. It was a joy to be involved in this project as it seemed to confirm that Glasgow was committed to the future of the museum. During Covid there was a move to close St Mungo’s or as the Council said, simply not to open it again. Interfaith Glasgow harnessed the help of religious leaders and interfaith activists and launched a campaign and petition to save the museum, emphasizing its importance as a unique interfaith resource and its role in promoting understanding between different faiths. This campaign was successful and in 2022 Glasgow City Council allocated funds to reopen the Museum.

 St Mungo’s has been an important part of my interfaith journey, and I value its significance, something I think Glasgow has failed to do for this latest attempt to close it was not the first. When it was opened in 1993 it was one of only two museums of religion in Europe and over the years consultors from as far away as Taiwan have come to learn from it when setting up their own museums of religion. It has an international reputation as a ground-breaking and innovative initiative.

The initiative for the museum came from one of Glasgow Museum’s curators, Dr Mark O’Neil when the venue was offered to Glasgow City Council by Glasgow Cathedral whose trustees had planned it as a visitors’ centre before running out of money. The proposal was for a museum that would explore the importance of religion in people’s everyday lives across the world and across time and promote mutual understanding and respect between people of different faiths and none.  When it was being set up the curators worked hard to involve stakeholders and be inclusive of all faiths. Through the Glasgow Sharing of Faiths faith communities were kept informed of developments, were consulted about the displays and even contributed to them. Because of this the various faith communities felt they had an investment in the museum. In a very special way it felt like home to them as it became a centre for interfaith activity both local and national. And I have been lucky enough to be part of most of these.

So, it’s no surprise that I was delighted to be part of this recent consultation and once more to be working with Interfaith Glasgow and museum staff. There were a series of exercises which we took part in in groups. My group consisted of a Jew, a Muslim, a Pagan and myself as a Catholic Christian.  We had been asked to bring along an object that said something about religion in the home.  Some religions of course have many such objects and others not so many. The young Muslim talked about his misbaha or prayer beads which are used to help and deepen remembrance of God by reciting one of the 99 glorious names for God on each of the 33 or 99 beads. This remembrance of God and repetition of one of God’s names is known as dhikr.  The Jewish man had several objects. One of them was the shofar, an instrument forged from a ram’s horn, which is blown in the synagogue on the first day of Rosh Hashanah and the last day of Yom Kippur. He also had a mezuzah which is the small case containing a parchment scroll with verses from the Torah, specifically the Shema prayer, which is fixed to the doorposts of Jewish homes and other living spaces and touched in remembrance of the Covenant when passing in and out. The lady from the Pagan Federation had two small wooden painted statues which represented for her divinity and also her connection with her ancestors.

I had a dilemma as to what I should take. In the past when I was growing up there would have been many objects in a Catholic home from traditional pictures of the Sacred Heart to holy water fonts to be used on entering and leaving the house, crosses or crucifixes. But now many Catholic homes would have no visible objects or art that expressed their faith. I decided to take a copy of Rembrandt’s Prodigal Son which is on my bedroom wall, the place where I do my daily meditation. It is a painting very dear to my heart.  35 years ago, I made an Ignatian thirty-day retreat and I spent a day simply sitting in front of this picture and gazing at it. As I gazed on this picture I could feel the loving embrace of the father s that I came to understand that at the very core of my being I was loved, that love is the Reality in which we all live and move and have our very being.  

Reflecting on these objects together our group could appreciate what they meant to each one and recognised similarities with our own faiths. We realised how important such objects are for strengthening membership of a faith community and for witnessing to it when visitors are welcomed into our home. But I also realised that while I have some Christian artefacts I also have objects from other faiths. In the room in which I am writing I have a cross, a picture of the Virgin Mary with Jesus, an ikon of the Trinity but I also have a larger statue of the Buddha, a small statue of Kuan Yin and one of the Hindu god Ganesha as well as the Lord Krishna.  I have books on interfaith spirituality and other faith traditions as well as Christian spirituality on my bookshelves.  What my house witnesses to is interreligious dialogue.  It is the home of an interfaith practitioner and I rather like that. 

0 Comments

Share the Good News

19/6/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
All religions have a message that contains their core beliefs and tells the story of their understanding of reality. For them this is good news. It helps them make sense of the world. It gives meaning to their lives and they wish to share it with others, believing it has universal truth and relevance. Within Christianity the word for this good news is gospel, a word derived from the Anglo-Saxon term god-spell, meaning “good story,” a rendering of the Latin evangelium and the Greek euangelion, meaning “good news” or “good telling.”  Evangelisation, the term used for the spread of this gospel, sometimes in a forcible way to encourage converts, is associated with Christianity. The forcible propagation of the faith, proselytisation as it is called, is denounced by other faiths and Christian themselves but all  religions are in fact as missionary as Christianity. All faiths have their own gospel with a message that they believe is relevant for everyone and have a desire to share it.

 For Muslims there is the duty of dawah i.e the duty of inviting others to understand and embrace Islam, and, like evangelisation in Christianity it can be directed to fellow Muslims as well as non- Muslims. It is rooted in the belief that Islam is the true religion, and Muhammad is God's final messenger with a message for the whole of humanity.  It is the responsibility of the Muslim community to convey this message to humanity, to reveal the truth that worship of and surrender to Allah, the one God of all is the way of peace.   

 Within the Baháʼí Faith there is the concept of pioneering, which involves individuals relocating to areas where the faith is not yet established with the aim of being able to offer the teachings of the Baha’i Faith and work with others to promote unity which is so central to the faith. It too sees its founder Baha’u’llah as a manifestation of God and a prophet for this time. The Bahai scriptures say “If ye be aware of a certain truth, if ye possess a jewel, of which others are deprived, share it with them in a language of utmost kindliness and good-will. If it be accepted, if it fulfil its purpose, your object is attained”. 

Buddhists too are intent on sharing the Dhamma, the teachings of the Buddha about the nature of reality and the practices that can liberate from suffering and lead to enlightenment. This teaching is seen as a universal truth and many Buddhist monks and teachers travel the world sharing this wisdom with their followers but also holding public talks, aimed at non-Buddhists. Sometimes at the end of retreats people will be invited to take refuge in the Buddha, the Dhamma and the Sangha (community), declaring a commitment to the Buddhist way. I have seen this when I have been privileged to make retreats with the Vietnamese Buddhist monk, Tich Nhat Hanh. 

So, all faiths have their gospel, their good news which they want to share. Interreligious dialogue is one place where this can be done but not in the sense of evangelising or preaching. I have experienced this sometimes in visits to places of worship or even at events, particularly during interfaith week when faith communities use this as an opportunity to invite other faiths to an event in their community. But usually the sharing at such events allows for listening and talking and is carried out in a spirit of friendship and openness. For me this often helps me see my own faith in a new light and recognise the universal nature of the truth at the heart of other faiths. I have been helped in this by my experience of Buddhist dialogue, particularly my retreats with Tich Nhat Hanh who I think had the genius required to express the Buddhist Dhamma in human terms that touched the heart of all who listened to him. It made me want to do the same for the good news of Christianity and express its gospel in terms that were relevant and meaningful for the modern age.

It so happened that a theology discussion group that I attend did try this recently. We were to come up with 5 statements that spoke to us of the heart of the gospel message. There were similarities and differences, and our attempts were in no way complete.   My attempts, no-where near Tich Nhat Hanh’s way of doing things were:
  • There is a holy mystery at the heart of the universe, a mystery some people call God. It is the source of life and love and the reality in which we live and move and have our very being.  This mystery manifests itself in all living beings and systems and calls us to fullness of life.  This is what makes everything sacred.
  • human beings (as well as other creatures) participate in the one life. Each one is a unique expression and manifestation of the life and love at the heart of the universe. Each person has been called forth from the beginning of time to take form at this point in history with the unique possibility and responsibility of respecting one another, rejoicing in diversity and so taking humanity and our planet further on their journey to wholeness.
  • all aspects of life are interconnected and interrelated so that the intentions and actions of each one affects others for good or for ill.  It is in community that we receive and give support to one another and encourage one another to live a purposeful and fruitful life.
  • Jesus is the prophet and teacher who manifests the Reality at the heart of life and shows us a heartfelt approach to life and religion so that we stand with and feel the pain of the oppressed and marginalised, reach out with love and compassion to our brothers and sisters and treat the earth with reverence and respect.
  • our commitment to follow the way of Jesus opens us up to his energy and spirit – a spirit which is the spirit of God.  It is this Spirit that keeps the memory of Jesus alive in his community and the world and motivates us to cooperate with others to contribute to a better future in which the values of justice, peace, integrity and wisdom which we call the values of the kingdom of God will be manifest wherever we find ourselves.​
Perhaps this is too wordy and could be summed up by the truth that love is at the heart of life and we are truly blessed if we know ourselves as loved and loving. 

0 Comments

The Balancing Act of Interfaith

30/5/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
One of the tasks of faith communities as they engage in interreligious dialogue is to look beyond themselves and their world to acknowledge and respect the world of others and to recognise the strength that comes from working together for the good of society and the world. Sometimes the message within the community appears different from the one addressed to those beyond it. This has been obvious in the first weeks of the new pontificate of Pope Leo. To the catholic community he has said, “we must be a missionary church together. We want to say to the world with humility and joy. Look to Christ! come closer to him! welcome his word that enlightens and consoles! Listen to his offer of love and become his one family”. This is an approach to mission that lays on Christians the responsibility to preach the good news to the ends of the earth and to encourage others to accept Jesus as their saviour. It can take the form of proselytization which actively and persuasively tries to change someone’s beliefs and convert them to the Christian religion.

But addressing people of other faiths and Christian traditions shortly after his inauguration Pope Leo also spoke of a call to service “with our sister Christian churches, with those who follow other religious paths, with those who are searching for God, with all women and men of goodwill in order to build a new world where peace reigns. “We are called”, he said, “to offer God’s love to everyone in order to achieve that unity that does not cancel out differences but values the personal history of each person and the social and religious culture of every people. "In a world wounded by violence and conflict, each of the communities represented here brings its own contribution of wisdom, compassion and commitment to the good of humanity and the preservation of our common home. I am convinced that if we are in agreement, and free from ideological and political conditioning, we can be effective in saying 'no' to war and 'yes' to peace; 'no' to the arms race and 'yes' to disarmament; 'no' to an economy that impoverishes peoples and the world.

Is there a contradiction in these two approaches? As an interfaith practitioner I have been a bit suspicious of the word evangelisation and do not likethe notion of proselytization. It reminds me of dark times in the Church’s history where the faith and culture of others was disrespected, seen as false and truth lay solely within the Christian and catholic faith. For the sake of their eternal salvation people needed to be converted, sometimes by being forced to listen to sermons about the Christian faith as were Jews in Spain in the Middle Age and to adopt what was a European rather than a Christian culture in continents like Asia and Africa.  I have felt increasingly uncomfortable with the call to make disciples of all nations and to baptise all people as expressed at the end of Matthew’s gospel as I have grown in knowledge of the wisdom and holiness to be found in other faiths and been inspired by their scriptures, their beliefs and their practices. My understanding of Christianity has been deepened and broadened by my experience of other faiths and I can see no reason why I should want my interfaith friends to abandon a faith that is obviously deep and leads to a holiness expressed in good works.

So, what do I do with this command to preach the gospel and what exactly is the gospel to be preached? Within the Catholic Church we now speak of a new evangelisation.  It is a term first coined by Pope John Paul II and then taken up by his successors. It is firstly an effort to renew the faith of Catholics and to encourage them to share their faith with others. But not in the way it was done in the past. Pope John Paul himself saw that it was not a repetition of the past but a way to forge new paths in responding to contemporary circumstances and conditions. It is not a question of re-evangelisation he said, “but rather of a new evangelization; new in its ardour, methods and expression.”  Interreligious dialogue is one place which offers the opportunity to share one’s faith but not in the hope of converting others. Rather it is to share the wisdom and truth which we believe is at the heart of our faith, a truth which has something to offer everyone.

Other faith communities feel exactly the same of course. They believe in their truth and its relevance to their own life and to others. We all believe we have a universal truth and wisdom, and it is easy to slip into a preaching mode when talking about it. I have been to some interfaith meetings when I have felt I was being preached at and a desire to share one’s faith needs to be balanced by a desire to know about others and to recognise that they too have their truth. It is to set out what we believe with a humility that acknowledges that what we are saying are statements of faith, not statements of objective facts. It is to offer the insights of our faith with humility and love. For me this means trying to explain the heart of Christianity in a way that shows its universal significance and does not rely on traditional religious terms that sound exclusive but rather in terms that  make sense to everyone.  Perhaps more of that in a future blog.  For the moment I feel that what I do in interfaith relations and what Pope Leo is doing is balancing two aspects of our faith while  focussing on cooperation and friendship that will allow for common concern and action for the good of humanity and the preservation of our common home..

0 Comments

Habemus Papam

10/5/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
  Habemus Papam, we have a Pope and with this traditional announcement Pope Leo XIV was introduced to the world. For some reason I was struck by the phrase this time round. It wasn’t the Church has a Pope, or the Cardinals have elected a Pope, it was simply we, the catholic community, bound at this moment by sadness over the death of one Pope and hoping for someone who would carry on the work and inspiration of Pope Francis. It is always a moment of joy and anticipation. What will he be like? While it is undoubtedly a family moment it is also a global moment and many outside the Church have acclaimed and welcomed a man who as a member of a religious order is surely a man of prayer, American born with Peruvian citizenship, missionary experience in Africa and Latin America and administrative experience in Peru and in Rome. His choice of name also gives a clue to his commitment to Justice and Peace. 

Leo XIII was Pope at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th cy. and is known for bringing the Church into the modern world and facing up to the problems of the day.  In his famous encyclical, Rerum Novarum, Latin for 'of revolutionary change in the world’ he addressed the social and economic issues of the late 19th century.  He promoted workers' rights to fair wages, safe conditions, and trade unions while supporting property rights and free enterprise. He opposed both socialist and communist doctrines as well as laissez-faire capitalism. His encyclical laid the foundations for a body of teaching known as The Church’s Social Teaching, often called the Church’s Best Kept Secret which is based on seven principles: the dignity of the human person, solidarity, the common good, the option for the poor, peace, creation and the environment and the dignity of work and participation.  

For Catholics the name Leo XIV was a sign that he intended to stand firmly in this tradition and today in a meeting with the Cardinals who elected him he confirmed this, saying that he identified with his namesake Pope Leo XIII. He also identified an issue that he obviously thinks is important - “in our own day, the church offers everyone the treasury of its social teaching in response to another industrial revolution and to developments in the field of artificial intelligence that pose new challenges for the defence of human dignity, justice and labour."  “He reiterated the path set in motion by the Second Vatican Council, a path renewed and reinterpreted under Pope Francis. He highlighted key themes from Pope Francis' Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium: the primacy of Christ, synodality, the sensus fidei (the supernatural "sense" of the faithful), popular piety, care for the poor, and courageous engagement with the world.” At the end of his discourse “he quoted Saint Paul VI, at the dawn of his own pontificate, praying that “a great flame of faith and love” may once again spread across the world, lighting the way for all people of good will”. 

What more could the world hope for and from the response to the death of Pope Francis and the announcement of a new Pope it is obvious that people of all faiths and none look to the Pope for inspiration and guidance. One letter from a Muslim friend of the Scottish Church wrote “This moment brings renewed hope and inspiration to the Catholic faithful and to all who share in the wider mission of building compassion, justice, and peace. As we receive the Holy Father’s vision for the Church and the world, I know it will be met with open hearts and thoughtful reflection here in Scotland.” And a Church of Scotland in a nearby neighbourhood rang its bells loud and clear when the announcement was made – something not previously known in a country that still suffers from sectarianism.  

Of course, there have already been critics, looking to his past and judging that 13 years ago he did not do enough about clerical abuse and even some Americans saying that while he may have been born in America he will not be committed to America First. There are also those writing his agenda, encouraging him to be committed to their particular cause such as the ordination of women, which I would of course agree with and because of my own ministry I would hope he would be committed to interfaith dialogue. Dialogue is a word he used when he came on to the balcony at St Peter’s to greet the community gathered there and the millions watching on their television screens.  I have no doubts that he will continue Pope Francis’ commitment to this, realising how powerful it would be if all faiths together could light a great flame of faith and love. It would certainly be stronger than any one faith doing it on their own.
​
The task of a Pope is a mammoth one. He has said it is a burden that is too great for him or for anyone to bear and it can only be done with the support of the body of Cardinals and all members of the Church. There are many internal issues and problems to be faced but I think no Pope can get on bandwagons. His role is principally to be a source of unity, trying to hold in tension those who think the Church is not moving quickly enough and should change and those who think that change is betraying past teaching and wanting to hold it back. In a sense the Pope holds the middle position – there are others whose role is to challenge it and show how it can move forward into a new era, there are those who will remind it not to throw the baby out with the bath water and the Pope who discerns the way forward, all the time proclaiming the good news that each of us is unique and valuable with great potential to bring about a society and a world in which justice, peace and love can flourish. 

0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    I am  a Catholic nun, involved in interfaith relations for many decades.  For me this has been an exciting and sacred journey which I would like to share with others.

    Picture

    Archives

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013

    RSS Feed

    Categories
    Religious Performances
    ​​

    All

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.